Publications

Project Development and Organization
by Dianne Irene Moffett
There are several factors that I consider in making a schedule. First, all
deadlines must be recognized. Secondly, I consider what projects or stages of
the projects could affect the performance or deadline of the other areas of
the project. If one stage cannot be completed without the other then that must
be considered and prioritized. The other factor is time management. There are
certain factors that must be achieved in each project and others that will be
compromised. I do not mean quality, but rather that there must be a system of
cut off to achieve things in a certain manner.
A factor in working in teams is project sharing. Sometimes multiple persons
are responsible for a project. By recognizing those who can master certain areas
and delegating properly, things run more smoothly. Sometimes working on multiple
things can be a blessing. Being over absorbed in one project for too long can
hinder your ability to see the big picture.
One of the models in project planning is the modified waterfall and spiral.
The approach is to define a problem and explore concepts, analyze the requirements,
design a prototype, implement testing, integration, then operation and maintenance.
Taking a faster waterfall approach can allow rapid minor changes to a project
within a larger effort.
Another factor to consider is concept learning between projects. What I mean
by this is that there are some systems that will tend to work for multiple projects.
If something works well, duplication can save on time, costs, and energy. Some
minor changes can take place rapidly to get things up and running while major
changes could be going on in the background and implemented as time permits.
It really depends on the project and the final goal.
Documentation and communication are essential in keeping the records, examples,
and ideas organized. There would be a lot of wasted energy and time if one member
of the team was handed off a project with no documentation and was thus left
to start from scratch. This would also create a pool of sorts for future projects
and serve as a referral bank to make things run more smoothly. Maintain ability
is another factor in design. Creating something that is hard to maintain will
certainly have a short shelf life.
Compatibility or what I call "common sensors" should be maintained
through any project. The more areas you can take a project and make it work,
the more efficient and successful future projects will be as well. Certainly,
the question asked in the beginning should be easily answered in the end. Appropriateness
can only be achieved by staying within the framework of the purpose.